Clean Energy Summit wrap-up: The future of the grid

One of the more frustrating aspects of the National Clean Energy Summit in Las Vegas this week was the lack of opportunity for interaction with the speakers.

At most conferences I go to, any presentation includes about 15 minutes of Q & A time, even for high-level speakers such as Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.  In fact, most speakers welcome the opportunity; they don’t only want to hear themselves talk.

But in Las Vegas, speakers were brought on and off stage with no opportunity for extra questions from the audience or the press. We were there to listen, not to participate or raise other points of view.

Which was unfortunate since some of the speakers and panels had important things to say, which in turn might have prompted good questions and comments from the audience.

A panel on providing better energy choices for consumers turned into a relatively high-level conversation of what modernization of the electrical grid could mean for consumers in terms of their daily use and conservation of electricity – certainly a timely topic as we face a weekend of high temperatures, utility alerts urging us to conserve and potential power outages due to overheated utility equipment.

Jon Wellinghoff, chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, spoke of smart grid innovations as eventually allowing consumers access to wholesale energy markets and the ability to change their energy use – when and how much to use certain appliances — based on wholesale prices.

Audrey Zibelman, founder of CEO of Viridity Energy, an energy management consulting firm, took that idea a step further, speaking of how access to wholesale markets would change consumers’ fundamental understanding of energy.

“Because storage is not readily available, the price of electricity is the price for the demand we have at that moment,” she said. “We can manage demand by exposing them to the impact they’re having on price. People don’t understand how much money they’re leaving on the table. Imagine what we could do if people (understood), ‘I can remove myself from the grid if I knew what the price is.’”

Zibelman also sees energy management and the smart grid as emerging technologies where American innovation can create jobs at home and a valuable export market.

But the real game-changer will be storage said Phil Giudice, CEO of Liquid Metal Battery Corporation, which is developing grid-level storage technology.

Instead of an energy system built around meeting minute-to-minute or peak demand, storage will allow the grid to operate on average demand, he said, which in turn will allow much greater use of intermittent energy sources such as wind and solar.

It’s not a matter of if, but when. Giudice is thinking about two more years before workable, cost-effective storage options are available.

Once again, Zibelman took it a step further,  envisioning the ultimate incentive for energy conservation for U.S. consumers, a cash payback for the energy they save or feed back into the grid.

“You have a home energy system; you might have solar, might have a battery. You signed up for a system that reduces energy cost, but you also get a check in the mail,” she said. “Consumers are easily becoming active members (in the grid). They know they are doing well because they’re getting a check in the mail.”

I would have loved to hear more about that, if only we’d had the opportunity to ask.

 

Might as well face it, we’re addicted to oil

I have been meditating — an occasionally dangerous past time for reporters – on the metaphor often used to describe the United States’ overdependence on fossil fuels, addiction, and what that might mean in terms of envisioning and implementing a recovery strategy.

The classic, 12-step recovery model requires putting the plug in jug — or in this case, the barrel — going cold turkey and learning to live life on life’s terms without one’s drug of choice.

Applied to fossil fuels, the standard argument against such an approach is that it’s not feasible. We don’t have the alternatives up and running to replace oil. True, for now.

That said, the model from another 12-step program — one that deals with eating disorders — might be a more useful approach, providing a number of intriguing directions to pursue. Food addictions are not well understood and, compared to alcohol, can be much more difficult to deal with because, of course, one cannot stop eating. 

One has to, instead, adopt different attitudes and behaviors around food and eating.

What would it look like if we decided to similarly change our relationship to fossil fuels?  Yes, we need energy, and fossil fuels are a major source for now, but the goal should be to reduce their use to a bare minimum – to those uses where nothing else will do — as quickly as humanly possible.

Even as our weather becomes increasingly erratic  –  and more clearly connected to fossil fuel-driven climate change –  we’ve got a lot of oil heads in Congress and corporate America in major denial about the impact of the U.S. and world’s fossil fuel addiction. And I don’t think anyone out there really wants to find out what it’s going to look like if and when we hit bottom — 12-step speak for all heck breaking loose.

One group looking for workable, timely solutions is the Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century, an international group with members ranging from high-level government and business representatives to nonprofits and local government groups.

Their mission is to stand up as much renewable energy as possible as quickly as possible worldwide, in both developing and industrialized countries. Their most recent publication, the Renewables 2012 Status Report, shows to what extent that is and isn’t happening.

The main take-away here is that ramping up renewables is a matter of a nation’s vision coupled with policy and commitment. The report notes:

At least 118 countries, more than half of which are developing countries, had renewable energy targets in place by early 2012, up from 109 as of early 2010. Renewable energy targets and support policies continued to be a driving force behind increasing markets for renewable energy, despite some setbacks resulting in a lack of long-term policy certainty and stability in many countries.

Last year, 71 percent of new power generation capacity in the European Union came from renewables, bringing the EU’s total renewable electricity production to 31.1 percent.

Compare those figures to the U.S. where renewable energy projects accounted for 39 percent of our new generation last year, bringing our total nationwide renewable generation — not including hydropower — to 4.7 percent, up from 3.7 in 2009.

Meanwhile, China has surged ahead with renewable development, leading the world with 282 gigawatts of renewable energy capacity. More than 20 percent of its new generation last year was non-hydro renewables.

Efforts by individual states also show that accelerated renewable ramp-up is possible. South Dakota now produces 22 percent of its power from wind, followed by Iowa at 19 percent.  In California, where utilities must generate 33 percent of their power from renewables by 2020 — the state’s three main utilities, Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric and San Diego Gas & Electric, have hit 20 percent or higher in power from renewable sources.

Of course, renewables are only one part of the bigger picture which must also include energy efficiency and major changes in our consumer culture and behavior around energy use.

Coming up with new ideas and approaches to such challenges will be at least part of the agenda at a high-level energy conference I’ll be attending Tuesday in Las Vegas. The 5th annual National Clean Energy Summit is sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, and as one might expect, he draws some big name speakers.

The opening keynote will be given by U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar — I’m hoping to get in a few questions about solar development in Riverside East — and President Bill Clinton will be giving the closing keynote and having an on-stage conversation with Reid.

In between there will be panels on getting off oil, fostering innovation and providing consumers with more and better energy choices.

I’ll also be visiting BrightSource Energy’s Ivanpah solar project – thousands of mirrors circling big solar concentrating towers — to get an advance peek at what the company has planned for its Rio Mesa and Palen projects in eastern Riverside County.

And yes, I’ll be blogging and tweeting from the conference and writing articles for The Desert Sun, so this time at least, what happens in Vegas definitely won’t be staying there.

 

Renewable energy roundtable

The Coachella Valley Economic Partinership’s Renewable Energy Roundtable  will be talking transmission when it meets at 7:30 a.m. Thursday at the UCR Palm Desert campus.

Yes, it’s early, but the roundtable is the place to be if you want to know what’s going on in the valley’s clean/green tech community.

Ralph Hitchcock, an energy consultant who also worked for private utilities, is the speaker. I talked with him last week after U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar’s announcement of the approval of the Devers-Palo Verde 2 transmission line and he raised some interesting concerns.

The original line, Devers-Palo Verde 1,  streches from Arizona — the Palo Verde part of the name — to the Devers substation in Palm Springs and points west. Arizona opted out of the second line, and that, Hitchcock said, means the new line will help, but may not provide increased reliability for the grid.

“If you were a two-lane road between Palo Verde in Arizona and Orange County, and you recognized  the need for a four-lane road, so between Blythe and Palm Springs you build four lanes, what does that do for your overall system?” he said. ”Our transmission grid is now very fragile. Yes,  we need new tranmission (but)  if you just increase the bubble in the middle, you’re not doing much to increase the overall. We need the Palo Verde section and we need the west of Devers section.

“Anything that just dumps more power into Devers doesn’t really contribute to strengthening the transmission system.”

All of which is to say, a lively conversation is expected.  See you there.

Energy rising for Riverside East solar

Momentum is building on the industrial scale solar projects in the in the Riverside East solar zone — 202,000 acres of public land between Joshua Tree National Park and Blythe.

In my email box today — the announcement from the Department of Energy that it has approved a $681.6 million loan guarantee for NextEra Energy’s Genesis project, a 250-megawatt solar thermal plant.

This Friday sees the official ground-breaking of Solar Millennium’s Blythe solar project — at 1,000 megawatts one of the largest solar thermal projects in the world.

U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar is going to be the headliner here, along with Bob Abbey, director of the Bureau of  Land Management.

The downside here is Solar Millennium continues to tightly control media access to the site.  Reporters and other offiicals invited to the event will be shuttled out to the site and then shuttled back to Palo Verde Community College for a reception.

I have been lobbying the company hard for several months to get a real site visit to meet and spend time with Solar Millennium’s biological and cultural monitoring teams to see what’s actually involved in clearing the land before construction.  So far I have been given excuses ranging from my lack of the special training required for site access (I said I would gladly take any training required) to personal safety — they were surveying the site for unexploded bombs left over from the land’s World War II use as Gen. George Patton’s desert training center. I was told later no bombs were found.

I have not given up getting my boots on the ground out there,  but not Friday.